Denmark has delivered an unusually blunt warning to the United States, stating that its armed forces are prepared to respond with immediate force if any attempt is made to invade Greenland. The statement has intensified diplomatic tensions between two NATO allies and highlighted growing unease over renewed American interest in the strategically crucial Arctic island.
Danish defence officials clarified that the warning is rooted in long-standing military rules of engagement dating back to the Cold War era. Under these rules, Danish troops stationed in Greenland are authorised to open fire without delay if the territory is attacked, regardless of the identity of the aggressor. The message, described by officials as a reminder rather than a provocation, was aimed at underscoring Denmark’s commitment to defending its sovereignty.
Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has become a focal point of global attention due to its strategic location in the Arctic, its role in missile defence and surveillance, and its vast untapped natural resources. Recent remarks by American political figures reviving the idea of the United States acquiring Greenland have caused concern in Copenhagen and across Europe.
Denmark’s Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, has reiterated that Greenland is not for sale and that any discussion about its future must respect international law and the will of the Greenlandic people. She has also warned that the use of force against Greenland would represent a serious breach of trust within NATO and could have far-reaching consequences for the alliance.
The United States, led by United States, has officially stated that it prefers dialogue and cooperation over confrontation. American officials have emphasised Greenland’s importance in countering growing Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic, while stopping short of endorsing any military action.
Within Greenland itself, opinions remain divided. While most political leaders support greater autonomy or eventual independence rather than integration with another country, a few voices have suggested that closer engagement with Washington could bring economic and security benefits. However, defence and foreign policy decisions remain under Danish control.
European leaders have largely rallied behind Denmark, stressing that borders and sovereignty cannot be altered by pressure or force. Analysts say the episode reflects broader geopolitical competition in the Arctic, where melting ice is opening new shipping routes and access to resources, increasing the strategic value of territories like Greenland.
For now, diplomats on both sides are seeking to lower the temperature, but the stark language used by Denmark has made clear that it is prepared to defend Greenland decisively if required.